User interface presentation of information in reconfigured or overlapping containers

ABSTRACT

A graphical user interface provides a display of multiple items of information in a manner such that the user can comprehend the relationship of various items to one another over a wide span. To achieve this result, at least some information containers are allocated a reduced amount of area in which to be viewed by the user. At least one container continues to be displayed in full view, however. In one embodiment, the containers are displayed in an overlapping arrangement. In a column view, for instance, the column containing the object that was last clicked upon, and the column showing the contents of the selected object, can be displayed in full view. The other columns may be only partially visible, due to the overlapping arrangement. However, the user is presented with enough information to comprehend the relationship of objects at different levels. When the user moves a cursor over a container with a reduced viewing area, the display changes to show that container in full view.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 10/835,458,filed Apr. 30, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,694,233.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is directed to graphical user interfaces forcomputers, and more particularly to the simultaneous display of multipleitems of information in a manner that facilitates user comprehension andnavigation among the items of information.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

During typical use of a computer, such as a personal computer, a varietyof situations arise in which multiple items of information are presentedto the user. For instance, the user may have several applications open,and each application typically has one or more containers to displaycontent associated with the application. In many graphical userinterfaces, such containers take the form of windows. The various itemsof information, i.e. the content of the respective windows, may beunrelated to one another. In other situations, the various items ofinformation may have a structured relationship to one another. Anexample of this latter situation is a display of the contents of thecomputer's file system.

A computer's file system is responsible for managing the reading andwriting of data on storage devices that are mounted on the computer, forexample internal disk drives, network storage devices, and the like. Inthe case of personal computers and workstations, a graphical userinterface might be used to view the structure of the file system, e.g.the hierarchy of objects such as directories, folders and files storedtherein. Typically, the graphical user interface provides a plurality ofalternative ways in which to view the contents of the file system. Forexample, one approach may comprise a hierarchical view, in which thenested relationship of files and folders to one another is displayed inthe form of a tree structure. A browser can be associated with this typeof view, in which the hierarchical view of folders and files isdisplayed in one pane of the browser window. When the user selects afolder in that pane, the contents of that folder are displayed inanother pane of the window. Each pane represents a separate container ofinformation.

In another approach, sometimes identified as an icon view, the files andfolders at a particular level of the file system structure are displayedas individual icons within a window. If the user clicks upon a folderwithin that window, the contents of that folder are displayed. Dependingon user preferences, the new information pertaining to the contents ofthe folder might replace the previous information within the existingwindow, or a new window might be displayed in an overlapping manner ontop of the existing window.

A column view offers another approach for displaying the contents of afile system. An example of the column view is illustrated in FIGS. 1 a-1f. FIG. 1 a illustrates a window having columns, or panes, thatconstitute containers corresponding to respective levels of the filesystem. In the example of FIG. 1 a, the left and middle columns displaythe objects at the two highest levels of the file system, respectively.The left column 10 identifies the available storage resources for thecomputer, in this case an internal hard disk drive 12, a removablecompact disk 14, and a network 16. In this example, the user has clickedon the icon for the hard disk drive 12, and consequently the files andfolders at the highest level of this storage medium are displayed in themiddle column 18. Since the list of folders and files to be displayed inthis column exceeds the height of the window, a vertical scroll bar 19is displayed adjacent the column, to permit the user to view all of theobjects on the hard disk drive.

If the user clicks on one of the folders in the second column 18, thedisplay changes to that illustrated in FIG. 1 b. In this view, a thirdcolumn 20 on the right side of the window illustrates the contents ofthe folder that was selected, in this case the folder labeled“Documents.”

If the user clicks on one of the folders in the third column 20, thedisplay changes to that illustrated in FIG. 1 c. In this view, all ofthe prior columns have shifted to the left, and a fourth column 24illustrates the contents of the folder on which the user clicked, inthis case the folder labeled “Web Pages.” In this view, the first column10 is no longer visible. If the user desires to view the first column,it is necessary to select a horizontal scroll bar 22 and move it to theleft, so that the contents of the window shift to the right, which willresult in the view of FIG. 1 b.

In a similar manner, if the user clicks on a folder in the fourth column24, the display changes to that illustrated in FIG. 1 d, in which afifth column 26 that lists the contents of the selected file isdisplayed. FIG. 1 e illustrates the results of clicking on a folder inthe fifth column 26, which results in the display of a sixth column 28,that lists the contents of the “Graphics” folder in the fifth column.Finally, if the user clicks on one of the documents in the column 28,information about that document appears in another new column 29, asshown in FIG. 1 f. It can be seen that, as each successive column isdisplayed, the scroll bar 22 becomes shorter, due to the fact that thereare a greater number of columns over which the user can scroll thedisplay.

It may be possible for the user to expand the size of the window, sothat a greater number of columns might be viewed at once. However, thereis a practical limit to the size of the window, and hence the number ofcolumns that can be viewed simultaneously. As a result, if more than afew levels of the file system are to be accessed, not all of the columnscan appear in the window together, and it becomes necessary for the userto scroll the displayed columns in order to view the contents of thevarious levels of the file system that are not adjacent one another.

As a result of the need to scroll the display in order to view separatedcolumns, the user is unable to obtain an overview of the total path fromthe highest level in the file system to a folder or file of interest.Since the user is only presented with a view that is limited to a fewadjacent levels of the file system at any one time, it is difficult toobtain the full context of the file system. For example, when viewingthe fifth, sixth and seventh columns illustrated in FIG. 1 f, the usermay not remember whether he is looking at files stored on the hard driveor those stored on a removable disk.

The foregoing problem is not limited to file system viewers. In general,it can arise in the context of any set of information in which thevarious items of information have a structured relationship to oneanother, such as a hierarchical relationship, and it is desirable toview such relationship over an appreciable range of items. For instance,it can occur in an application which displays program code objects inthe form of a hierarchy.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In accordance with one feature of the present invention, the graphicaluser interface provides a display of multiple containers of informationin a manner such that the user can comprehend the relationship ofvarious items in the containers to one another over a wide span. Toachieve this result, at least some of the containers are allocated areduced amount of area in which to be viewed by the user. At least onecontainer continues to be displayed in full view, however. In oneembodiment, the containers are displayed in an overlapping arrangement.In a column view, for instance, the column containing the object thatwas last clicked upon, and the column showing the contents of theselected object, can be displayed in full view. The other columns may beonly partially visible, due to the overlapping arrangement. However, theuser is presented with enough information to comprehend the relationshipof objects at different levels. As a result of this arrangement, theuser is able to view the entire path leading from the highest level ofthe information structure to an object of interest without unduescrolling.

Techniques other than overlap can be used to display containers with areduced viewing area. For instance, rather than obscuring some of thecontents of a container by overlapping, it may be preferable to scalethe container in one or both dimensions, so that the entire contents ofthe container remain visible in the reduced area, albeit in compressedform. As another example, an animation can be applied to the containersso that they appear to rotate out of the plane of the display and becomestacked closer together.

As another feature of the invention, when the user moves a cursor over acontainer with a reduced viewing area, or otherwise directs attention tosuch a container, the other containers move on the display to show thatcontainer in full view. This feature of the invention can be applied toany type of information containers that are displayed in a reduced area.For example, in addition to overlapping columns, it can be utilized inconjunction with windows that have an overlapping arrangement on adisplay. By simply navigating around the display area, for example bymoving a cursor, the user can be presented with a full view of thecontents of any given container.

Further features of the invention, and the advantages achieved thereby,are described hereinafter with reference to exemplary embodimentsillustrated in the accompanying figures.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIGS. 1 a-1 f illustrate successive screens in a conventional columnview of a file system;

FIG. 2 is a general block diagram of an exemplary computer system inwhich the present invention can be implemented;

FIG. 3 is a block diagram of the architecture of some of the softwareand hardware components of the computer system;

FIGS. 4 a-4 d illustrate examples of a column view for the file systemin accordance with the present invention;

FIGS. 5 a-5 d schematically depict the adjustment of column widths as awindow is resized;

FIGS. 6 a-6 c illustrate the gradual growth of a shadow as a column isoverlapped;

FIG. 7 is an illustration of the application of the present invention toa list view;

FIGS. 8 a-8 c illustrate examples of the application of the presentinvention to windows; and

FIGS. 9 a and 9 b illustrate an implementation of the invention in whichcolumns are rotated out of the plane of the display.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

To facilitate an understanding of the present invention, it is describedhereinafter with reference to its implementation in an operating systemfor personal computers. Further in this regard, examples of a graphicaluser interface are provided with reference to a file system column viewin the Macintosh Operating System (Mac OS) developed by Apple Computer,Inc., to provide the reader with specific examples of the concepts whichunderlie the invention. It will be appreciated, however, that theinvention is not limited to these illustrative examples. Rather, theprinciples upon which the invention is based can be applied to a varietyof different types of computer operating systems, as will be apparent tothose of skill in the art. Likewise, they are not limited to viewing ofa file system, and can be used in the presentation of various types ofinformation, as well as different forms of information containers.

An exemplary computer system, of the type in which the present inventioncan be implemented, is illustrated in block diagram form in FIG. 2. Theexemplary computer system includes a computer 30 having a variety ofexternal peripheral devices 32 connected thereto. The computer 30includes at least one central processing unit (CPU) 34 and associatedmemory. This memory generally includes a main memory which is typicallyimplemented in the form of random access memory 36, a static memory thatcan comprise a read only memory 38, and a permanent storage device, suchas a magnetic or optical disk 40. The CPU 34 communicates with each ofthese forms of memory through an internal bus 42. The peripheral devices32 include a data entry device such as a keyboard 44, and a pointing orcursor control device 46, such as a mouse, trackball, pen or the like.One or more display devices 48, such as a CRT monitor or an LCD screen,provides a visual display of information, including the variouscomponents of a graphical user interface. Hard copies of desiredinformation can be provided through a printer 50, or similar suchdevice. A network connection 52 provides the computer with access to oneor more servers, which may function as gateways, file storage systems,messaging systems, and the like. Each of these peripheral devices 32communicates with the CPU 34 by means of one or more input/output ports54 on the computer.

The CPU 34 executes software programs that are retrieved from thepermanent storage device 40 or remotely accessible storage devices, andloaded into its working memory 36. Components of the computer'soperating system that are involved in the implementation of the presentinvention are depicted in the block diagram of FIG. 3. The computer'soperating system 56 performs basic low-level functions and interactswith the hardware components of the computer system. As illustrated inFIG. 3, the operating system includes a file system 58 that isresponsible for managing the reading and writing of data on storagedevices 60 that are mounted on the computer system, such as thepermanent memory 40 and/or remote file servers. For instance, the filesystem retrieves files and provides them to applications 62, and storesfiles created by the applications. Another component of the operatingsystem 56 is a display manager 64, which controls the information thatis presented to the monitor 48 for display to the user. The graphicaluser interface 66 is another component of the operating system thatinteracts with the display manager to present information on the displaydevice 28. For example, the graphical user interface provides thedisplay manager with data that describes the appearance and position ofwindows, icons, control elements and similar types of user interfaceobjects. The graphical user interface might provide this informationdirectly to the display manager 64, or via a windows manager 68.

The windows manager 68 controls the display of windows in which data ispresented to the user. Such data may be documents generated byapplication programs 62, or the contents of the file system 58. Oneembodiment of the present invention is described hereinafter withreference to the window in which the contents of the file system aredisplayed. An example of such a window 70 is illustrated in FIG. 4 a,which corresponds to the view of FIG. 1 b. This particular windowcontains a first column 72 that illustrates the resources at the highestlevel of the file system, a second column 74 illustrating the firstlevel of files and folders stored in one of those resources, namely thehard disk, and a third column 76 that displays the contents of aselected folder from the second column 74. Referring to FIG. 4 b, whenthe user clicks on one of the folders or files in the third column 76, afourth column 78 is displayed in the window 70, which contains thecontents of the selected folder. Unlike the conventional systemillustrated in FIGS. 1 a-1 f, however, the display of the fourth columndoes not cause the first column 72 to disappear from view. Rather, asillustrated in FIG. 4 b, the columns are arranged so that the firstcolumn 72 continues to be displayed, but with a reduced area beingallocated to that column. With this arrangement, at least a portion ofthe first column remains visible.

A number of different techniques can be employed to display the column72 in a reduced area. In the example of FIG. 4 b, the columns arearranged so that column 74 appears to overlap column 72. Similarly, aportion of column 74 is overlapped by column 76. To accomplish thisresult, the user interface maintains information regarding the originalwidth and content of each of the columns. However, instead of arrangingthe columns in a conventional side-by-side fashion, some of the columnsare positioned in an overlapping manner, with the effective depths ofthe columns increasing from right to left across the window. In theillustrated example, column 72 is at a greater effective depth thancolumn 74, and column 74 is at a greater depth than column 76, so thatcolumn 72 is obscured by column 74 in the area where they overlap, andcolumn 74 is obscured by column 76 in the area where they overlap.

FIG. 4 c illustrates the column view after the user has continued toselect objects in successive levels of the file system hierarchy,corresponding to the views of FIGS. 1 c-1 f. As an object in eachsuccessive level is selected, another column 78-84 appears on thedisplay, to illustrate the contents of the selected object. As columnsare added to the window, the amount of overlap among adjacent columnsincreases, to accommodate all of the displayed columns within the window70.

Preferably, two of the columns remain in full view, so that the user canread the entire name of a file or folder. These two columns comprise thefocus column, which is the latest column that the user clicked upon, andthe contents column, which displays the contents of the file or folderthat was clicked upon in the focus column. In the example of FIG. 4 c,column 82 is the focus column, and column 84 is the contents column. Allof the other columns are displayed in an overlapping manner, which cancause the names of the files or folders to become partially obscured.

However, enough of each column still remains visible to give the user anoverview of the relationship of the levels to one another. If the userdesires to see the full name of a file or folder in one of theoverlapped columns, the cursor can be positioned over the columncontaining the object of interest. In response, the column beneath thecursor is displayed at its full width, as illustrated in FIG. 4 d. To doso, the graphical user interface calculates new positions for each ofthe columns, and moves them as required to achieve such a result. Moreparticularly, the area that is occupied by the new focus column overwhich the cursor 86 resides, i.e., column 76 in the example of FIG. 4 d,is first determined, based upon the current position of that column. Theavailable space between this focus column and the content column 84 isthen divided among the intervening columns 78, 80 and 82, and a newposition is calculated for each of these intervening columns. Thecolumns are then moved horizontally from their original positions to thenew, calculated positions, and their effective depths are assigned sothat they will appear to be overlapped by the column to the right.

Preferably, this movement is performed in an animated fashion, to createthe impression that the columns are shifting out of the way of the focuscolumn. In one embodiment, once their respective positions aredetermined, each of the intervening columns can be individually shiftedacross the display using an ease-out/ease-in algorithm of the typedescribed in U.S. application Ser. No. 09/754,147, filed Jan. 5, 2001,the content of which is incorporated herein by reference. The timeperiod over which the movement takes place can be determined inaccordance with the length of the path over which the columns musttravel. The greater the number of pixels over which the columns mustmove, the longer the allotted time of travel can be. Of course, otheralgorithms for determining the rate of movement can be employed as well.

It may be the case that the user has multiple windows open on thedisplay which each contain a column view of objects. For instance, awindow might be open for each of the three file system resources 12, 14and 16. When the cursor is being moved over the active one of thesewindows, the positions of the columns within that window can shiftimmediately in response to such movement. However, when the cursor istraversing one of the inactive windows, for example while it is beingmoved to a menu bar or dock at one edge of the display, it may bedisturbing to have the columns in these inactive windows shift with suchmovement. Accordingly, a delay can be employed to determine whethercolumns in inactive windows should move in response to cursor position.If the user pauses the cursor over a column of an inactive window for asuitable period of time, e.g. one second, then the columns in thatwindow can shift positions so that the column beneath the cursor becomesthe focus column. However, if the cursor is over the column for lessthan that period of time, no movement takes place.

In the example of FIG. 4 d, the focus column is that column over whichthe cursor is positioned, and the content column remains as the onecontaining the contents of the most recently selected object. In theexample, therefore, the content column is column 84, since it displaysinformation about the file in column 82 that was last selected by theuser. It will be appreciated, however, that other combinations ofcolumns could be selected for display at their full width. For instance,if the column 76 becomes the focus column, the adjacent column 78illustrating the contents of the last object that was previouslyselected in the focus column could be displayed at full width, insteadof the column 84. As another alternative, both columns 78 and 84 couldbe displayed at full width, in addition to the focus column 76, assumingthe window 70 is sufficiently wide to accommodate such a displayconfiguration.

It may be desirable to establish a minimum width for an overlappedcolumn, to enable the user to assess the identity of the objects in thecolumn. For instance, in the examples of FIGS. 4 c and 4 d, theoverlapped columns have a width that permits each object's icon and thefirst few letters of its title to be visible, which enables the user tostill recognize the objects. Of course, when a minimum width isestablished for overlapped columns, it may not be possible to displayevery column in the window 70 if the path to a particular object passesthrough a significant number of levels, e.g. more than ten. In such acase, therefore, a horizontal scroll bar (not shown) can be added to thewindow 70, to enable the user to view all of the columns. Even in thatsituation, however, it can be appreciated that the overlapping columnsprovide the user with a much more comprehensive view of the file systemstructure than in the full-width views of FIGS. 1 a-1 f.

In one embodiment, the visible portion of each of the overlapped columnscan be the same for each such column. To accomplish this result, thewidths of the two full-view columns, i.e. the focus and content columns,are subtracted from the total width of the window, and the remainingwidth of the window is equally allocated among the other columns for thedisplay of their visible portions. The position of each column iscalculated, and the columns are displayed at the correspondingpositions.

In some cases within this embodiment, however, the visible portions ofthe overlapped columns could end up being different from one another.This could occur, for instance, if the user manually adjusts the borderof one or more of the columns within the window. In this situation, itmay be desirable to return the visible portions of the columns to equalwidths if the window is resized. The algorithm for determining the sizesof the columns is schematically depicted in FIGS. 5 a-5 d. These figuresillustrate an example of a window 90 containing five columns 92-100. Inthe initial state of FIG. 5 a, the columns have different respectivewidths D₁-D₅. If the user resizes the window to decrease its width, theuser interface first reduces the visible portion of the column havingthe widest viewing area, in this case column 96, until the width of itsviewing area is the same as that of the visible portion of the column 98having the next widest viewing area, i.e. D₄, as shown in FIG. 5 b. Atthis point, if the user continues to decrease the width of the window90, the visible portions of both columns 96 and 98 are reducedsimultaneously, until they are equal to the width D₃ of the visibleportion of the next widest column 92, as depicted in FIG. 5 c. Furtherreduction in the width of the window 90 causes the visible portions ofall three columns 92, 96 and 98 to be reduced concurrently, until theyare equal to the visible width D₂ of the next widest column 100, asshown in FIG. 5 d. The process continues in this manner as the window isfurther resized until the visible portions of all of the columns havethe same width, at which time they are all reduced by the same amount,until the minimum width is reached. If further resizing of the window 90occurs beyond this point, a horizontal scroll bar is displayed to enablethe user to reposition the columns within the visible area of thewindow. While not illustrated in the examples of FIGS. 5 a-5 d, thefocus and content columns are displayed at their full widths throughoutthis process.

In other embodiments of the invention, the overlapped columns may havedifferent respective widths allocated to their visible portions. Forinstance, it may be preferable to employ a logarithmic or othernon-linear variance among the overlapped columns, in accordance withtheir distance from the focus column. In such an arrangement, the columnclosest to the focus column can have the widest visible area, the columnnext to that can have the next widest visible portion, and so on down tothe minimum width for the columns farthest away from the focus column.

To reinforce the impression that the columns overlap one another, it ispreferable to display a shadow along the vertical interface of twooverlapping columns. For example, a typical shadow might have a width ofabout five pixels. However, if such a shadow suddenly pops into view atthe instant two columns begin to overlap, the effect could be disturbingto the user. In accordance with another feature of the invention,therefore, the width of the shadow gradually grows from the edge of theoverlapping column as the visible portion of the adjacent column isreduced. To illustrate, FIG. 6 is an edge view of two adjacent columns96 and 98, corresponding to the initial state of FIG. 5 a. As the column96 begins to be overlapped, a narrow shadow appears along the left edgeof window 98. For instance, as shown in FIG. 6 b, as the visible portionof column 96 is reduced by two pixels, a shadow 102 having a width ofone pixel is displayed. This shadow might be comprised of a line ofblack or grey pixels having a suitable transparency value, e.g. 40-60%,so that they only partially obscure the underlying column 96. As thecolumn 96 is further overlapped by another two pixels, the shadow cangrow by the width of another pixel, as shown in FIG. 6 c. The growth ofthe shadow in this manner can continue until it reaches its full desiredwidth, e.g. 5 pixels.

The foregoing example of the adjustment of a column's visible width isdescribed in the context of resizing a window. The same approach can beemployed when columns are added to a window, for example as the userclicks upon objects at successive levels of the file system hierarchy.The same type of animation is preferably employed when a new column isadded to the window. Thus, with reference to FIGS. 4 a and 4 b, when theuser clicks on an object in column 76, the new column 78 slides intoview. In this particular example, the new column slides in from theright side of the window, and the column 76 slides to the left into itsoverlapping arrangement with column 74. At the same time, column 74slides into its overlapping arrangement with column 72. As eachadditional column is added, the columns slide further to the left, toincrease the amount of overlap correspondingly. The same techniques canbe employed in other implementations where columns might be added fromthe left side of the window, or inserted into the middle of the windowbetween existing columns. Likewise, it is equally applicable tocontainers that are vertically stacked, rather than horizontallyarranged.

The examples of FIGS. 4-6 are presented with reference to a column view,in which each column corresponds to a level of a hierarchy. Theapplicability of the invention is not limited to this particular type ofviewer, however. For instance, FIG. 7 illustrates a list view ofobjects, which might be employed with a collection of objects that neednot have a hierarchical or other structured relationship to one another.In this view, the left field 104 lists the objects of interest, e.g.objects in a folder. Successive fields 106-110 list attributes of eachobject, such as its parent object, date modified and kind of object. Toenable all of the attributes of an object to be assessed by the user,the attribute lists can be displayed in an overlapping fashion, in thesame manner as the columns of FIGS. 4 b and 4 c. Similarly, the slidingof the lists can occur in response to movement of the cursor over thedifferent fields, to enable the user to obtain a full view of aparticular attribute of interest.

The ability to slide overlapping containers, to enable the user tonavigate among them and see them in full view, is useful in othercontexts as well. For instance, it can be utilized in connection withoverlapping windows. FIG. 8 a illustrates a sequence of overlappingwindows that are arrayed in a vertical direction. In this view, thelowest window 112 is the active window, and is displayed in full view.As the user moves the cursor upwardly, the windows slide vertically, toenable the particular window over which the cursor is currentlypositioned to come into full view. Thus, as can be seen in FIG. 8 b, theuser has moved the cursor up, to position it over the center window 116.In response to this movement, the lowest window 112 and the interveningwindow 114 have slid downwardly, to enable the window 116 to bedisplayed in full view. The sliding of the windows preferably takesplace in an animated fashion, in accordance with a movement algorithmsuch as the one referenced previously.

Further movement of the cursor in an upward direction can causeadditional windows to slide downwardly on the display. FIG. 8 cillustrates the result when the user has moved the cursor to the topwindow 120. In this case, each of the windows 116 and 118 has also sliddownwardly, to enable the window 120 to be displayed in full view.

The mechanism to achieve this feature is the same as that describedpreviously in connection with the sliding columns. More particularly,since the user interface, and more specifically the windows manager 68,maintains information regarding the size and position of each openwindow in the display, it can readily determine the area occupied by anywindow over which the cursor is positioned, i.e. the focus window. Oncethis area has been determined, the remaining area of the display isallocated to the other windows that overlap the focus window, eitherequally or with variance among them. In the case of FIG. 8 b, thevertical distance below the window 116 is divided in two, and thewindows 112 and 114 are positioned accordingly. When the cursor is movedto the position of FIG. 8 c, the vertical dimension below the window 120is divided into fourths, and the windows 112-118 slide to thecorresponding positions. If any windows are located to the right or leftof the focus window, the same procedure is employed to move themhorizontally out of the way of the focus window.

The sliding of windows and other containers in this manner to enable theuser to obtain a full view of any one of them is advantageous, in thatit avoids the need to click on each individual window to bring it to theforeground of the display, which could result in another window beingcompletely hidden behind the one that was clicked upon, and thereforeinaccessible. It also avoids the need to minimize windows that overlap awindow of interest, which results in a change in the configuration ofthe displayed windows. With the present invention, the currently activewindow, e.g. window 112 in the example of FIGS. 8 a-8 c, can remain theactive window, even as the user moves the cursor around the display areato obtain a full view of other windows. If the user locates anotherwindow he desires to work within, he can click in that window to make itthe active one. If the user moves the cursor off the focus window, e.g.slides the cursor to the right in the view of FIG. 8 c, the windows canremain in their current states. Thus, window 120 remains in full view,even though window 112 may be the active window.

The application of this navigation technique to other types ofcontainers can be envisioned as well. For instance, the pages of adocument can be displayed in a stacked arrangement. By moving the cursorover the visible edges of the pages, the user can bring any desired pageinto full view, with the preceding pages moving out of its way. Anotherapplication is text chat boxes associated with instant messaging typesof programs. If a user is conducting several conversations at once, suchthat the boxes overlap one another, it is possible to readily observeany given one of them by simply moving the cursor to the box associatedwith that chat session. As another example, different workspaces can bebrought into view on a display by moving the cursor so that oneworkspace slides out of view while another moves onto the screen.Similarly, if the user opens multiple web pages within a browser, thecursor can be used to select among the pages within a single browserwindow, rather than require a separate window for each page.

The implementation of this technique is not limited to movement of thecursor. Rather, it can be employed with any type of user input devicethat enables the user to direct focus to different containers. Forexample, some graphical user interfaces enable the user to switch amongopen windows by means of the keyboard, e.g. actuation of the “Tab” key.As another example, some types of devices employ a scroll wheel to movefrom one information container to another. Regardless of the mechanismemployed to identify a given container, the present invention can beemployed to bring that container into full view.

Furthermore, the applicability of this feature of the invention is notlimited to user input to select a container. In some situations,system-generated events could cause a particular container to bedisplayed in full view. For instance, in the context of the text chatapplication described previously, if a new message is received in one ofthe open chat boxes, any boxes that overlap that box can move out of itsarea, to enable the user to read the incoming message. As anotherexample, in a file system view, if a new file is added to a server, thefocus can automatically switch to the column associated with the levelat which the file was added.

The foregoing examples have been presented with reference to oneembodiment of the invention, in which the reduced area for the visibleportion of a container is obtained by overlapping adjacent containers.Other techniques can be employed as well to achieve the same generalresults. For instance, rather than overlapping columns or windows, it ispossible to scale the containers to fit into the allocated area. In thecase of columns, therefore, the actual width of the column is scaledback to the size of the allocated area. In this situation, the entirecontents of the column remain visible, but in a horizontally compressedform.

In another variation, a three-dimensional animation can be applied tothe containers, which causes them to appear to swing out of the plane ofthe display. The result is analogous to the effect of leafing throughthe pages of a book or scanning through folders in a file drawer. FIGS.9 a and 9 b illustrate examples of such an effect. In FIG. 9 a, column122 is the focus column and column 124 is the content column. Thereducing viewing area of the other columns 126-132 is achieved byhorizontally compressing each column and adding shading so that itappears that the right edges of the columns are at a greater depth thantheir left edges. The impression created by this effect is that thecolumns 126-132 have pivoted about their left edges towards the back ofthe display.

FIG. 9 b illustrates the result when the cursor has moved over a newfocus column 128. In the animation to create this effect, the new focuscolumn “swings” forward by increasing its width and removing theshading. At the same time, the previous focus column 122 “swings” backby reducing its width and adding appropriate shading, and theintermediate columns 130 and 132 slide to the right. This type ofanimation is particularly appropriate for the example describedpreviously, in which the pages of a document are displayed in a stackedarrangement. As the user moves the cursor over the visible edges of thepages, overlapping pages can flip out of the way of the page beingviewed, to provide a realistic effect.

From the foregoing, it can be seen that the present invention provides auser interface that enables the user to obtain a comprehensive view ofmultiple items of information that are located in different respectivecontainers. As a result, the user is not required to actively selectdifferent containers or scroll across significant distances if a largenumber of containers are being displayed.

It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the presentinvention can be embodied in other specific forms without departing fromthe spirit or essential characteristics thereof, and that the inventionis not limited to the specific embodiments described herein. Thepresently disclosed embodiments are therefore considered in all respectsto be illustrative and not restrictive. The scope of the invention isindicated by the appended claims rather than the foregoing description,and all changes that come within the meaning and range and equivalentsthereof are intended to be embraced therein.

What is claimed is:
 1. A method for displaying information in a graphicuser interface of a computer system, said method comprising: causing thecomputer system to display a plurality of containers of information,wherein: a first container of the plurality of containers of informationis a content container and displayed in full view, a second container ofthe plurality of containers of information is a focus container anddisplayed in full view, and the remaining containers of information aredisplayed in a first overlapping arrangement such that a plurality ofthe remaining containers of information are only partially visible dueto the first overlapping arrangement; causing the computer to detect anevent that selects a third container from the remaining containers ofinformation; and causing the computer system to reposition thecontainers of information, excluding said content container, based onsaid detection, wherein said repositioning includes moving anddisplacing one or more of the unselected containers of information suchthat the third container of information is displayed in full view andthe unselected containers of information, including said secondcontainer are displayed in a second overlapping arrangement such that aplurality of the unselected containers of information are only partiallyvisible due to the second overlapping arrangement and the contentcontainer remains visible in full view, and wherein said third containerof information becomes the focus container in response to the event. 2.The method of claim 1, wherein said containers are columns in a window.3. The method of claim 1, wherein said containers are windows.
 4. Themethod of claim 1, wherein said repositioning includes, displaying ananimation of the unselected containers sliding to respective destinationpositions.
 5. The method of claim 4, wherein the unselected containersslide within a single dimension of movement.
 6. The method of claim 4,wherein displaying the animation comprises: determining the areaoccupied by said third container; determining an area available for theunselected containers; determining the respective destination positionsfor the unselected containers in the available area; and moving saiddisplaced containers to the respective destination positions.
 7. Themethod of claim 1, wherein said event is associated with a user inputaction to shift focus to said third container.
 8. The method of claim 7,wherein said user input action is movement of a cursor to a positionover said third container.
 9. The method of claim 8, including causingthe computer system to inhibit said repositioning of the unselectedcontainers until said cursor remains over said third container for apredetermined period of time.
 10. The method of claim 1, wherein saidevent is generated by the computer system.
 11. The method of claim 1,including causing the computer system to display shadows at overlappingportions of said unselected containers.
 12. The method of claim 11,wherein the widths of said shadows are proportional to the amount ofoverlap between containers.
 13. A non-transient computer-readable mediumhaving encoded thereon a graphic user interface for a computer systemthat, when executed by a processor, causes the computer system to:display a plurality of containers, wherein: a first container of theplurality of containers of information is a content container anddisplayed in full view; a first container of the plurality of containersof information is a focus container and displayed in full view, and theremaining containers of information are displayed in a first overlappingarrangement such that a plurality of the remaining containers ofinformation are only partially visible due to the first overlappingarrangement; detect an event that selects a third container from theother containers in the stack; and reposition the containers ofinformation, excluding said content container, based on said detection,wherein said repositioning includes moving and displacing one or more ofthe unselected containers of information such that the third containerof information is displayed in full-view and the unselected containersof information, including said second container, are displayed in asecond overlapping arrangement such that a plurality of the unselectedcontainers of information are only partially visible due to the secondoverlapping arrangement and the content container remains visible infull view, and wherein said third container of information becomes thefocus container in response to the event.
 14. The computer-readablemedium of claim 13, wherein said containers are columns in a window. 15.The computer-readable medium of claim 13, wherein said containers arewindows.
 16. The computer-readable medium of claim 13, wherein thegraphic user interface causes the computer system to display ananimation of the unselected containers sliding to respective destinationpositions.
 17. The computer-readable medium of claim 16, wherein theunselected containers slide within a single dimension of movement. 18.The computer-readable medium of claim 16, wherein the graphic userinterface causes the computer system to: determine the area occupied bysaid third container; determine an area available for the unselectedcontainers; determine the respective destination positions for theunselected containers in the available area; and move said displacedcontainers to the respective destination positions.
 19. Thecomputer-readable medium of claim 18, wherein the graphic user interfacecauses the computer system to inhibit said repositioning of theunselected containers until said cursor remains over said thirdcontainer for a predetermined period of time.
 20. The computer-readablemedium of claim 13, wherein said event is associated with a user inputaction to shift focus to said third container.
 21. The computer-readablemedium of claim 20, wherein said user input action is movement of acursor to a position over said third container.
 22. Thecomputer-readable medium of claim 13, wherein said event is generated bythe computer system.
 23. The computer-readable medium of claim 13,wherein the graphic user interface causes the computer system to displayshadows at the overlapping portions of said unselected containers. 24.The computer-readable medium of claim 23, wherein the widths of saidshadows are proportional to an amount of overlap between containers. 25.A computer system, comprising: a display device; a processor; and amemory device having program instructions for a graphic user interfacestored thereon, said program instructions, when executed by theprocessor configuring the computer system to: display a plurality ofcontainers, wherein: a first container of the plurality of containers ofinformation is a content container and displayed in full view, a secondcontainer of the plurality of containers of information is a focuscontainer and displayed in full view, and the remaining containers ofinformation are displayed in a first overlapping arrangement such that aplurality of the remaining containers of information are only partiallyvisible due to the first overlapping arrangement; detect an event thatselects a third container from the other containers in the stack; andreposition the containers of information, excluding said contentcontainer, based on said detection, wherein said repositioning includesmoving and displacing one or more of the unselected containers ofinformation such that the third container of information is displayed infull-view and the unselected containers of information, including saidsecond container, are displayed in a second overlapping arrangement suchthat a plurality of the unselected containers of information are onlypartially visible due to the second overlapping arrangement and thecontent container remains visible in full view, and wherein said thirdcontainer of information becomes the focus container in response to theevent.
 26. The computer system of claim 25, wherein said containers arecolumns in a window.
 27. The computer system of claim 25, wherein saidcontainers are windows.
 28. The computer system of claim 25, whereinsaid program instructions configure the computers system to display ananimation of the unselected containers sliding to respective destinationpositions.
 29. The computer system of claim 28, wherein the unselectedcontainers slide within a single dimension of movement on the display.30. The computer system of claim 28, wherein said program instructionsconfigure the computer system to: determine the area occupied by saidthird container; determine an area available for the unselectedcontainers; determine the respective destination positions for theunselected containers in the available area; and move said displacedcontainers to the respective destination positions.
 31. The computersystem of claim 30, wherein said program instructions configure thecomputer system to inhibit said repositioning of the unselectedcontainers until said cursor remains over said third container for apredetermined period of time.
 32. The computer system of claim 25,wherein said event is associated with a user input action to shift focusto said third container.
 33. The computer system of claim 32, whereinsaid user input action is movement of a cursor to a position over saidthird container.
 34. The computer system of claim 25, wherein said eventis generated by the computer system.
 35. The computer system of claim25, wherein said program instructions configure the computer system todisplay shadows at overlapping portions of said unselected containers.36. The computer system of claim 35, wherein the widths of said shadowsare proportional to the amount of overlap between containers.